Clym Logo

Nonprofit Website Accessibility Checklist

Published
AM
AuthorAlex Margau
5 min read

Nonprofit Website Accessibility Checklist

A categorized checklist covering legal review, navigation, forms, documents, and testing to help nonprofits prioritize website accessibility work.

Summarize full article with:

Website accessibility can involve everything from keyboard navigation and donation forms to PDFs, testing, and visitor feedback. This checklist organizes those areas into eight practical categories so your nonprofit can work through them one at a time.

For the legal background and reasoning behind each area, see our nonprofit website accessibility guide. Here, the focus is action: what to review and what to prioritize first.

Key takeaways
  • This checklist is organized by practical area, not legal framework, since most nonprofits need to address several areas regardless of which specific law or rule applies.
  • Completing every item is a useful starting point, not confirmation of legal compliance or full accessibility.
  • Pages and content tied to important visitor tasks, such as donations, applications, registration, and program access, are useful places to prioritize your review.
  • Testing is not a one-time task. Retesting after redesigns, CMS changes, or new third-party tools matters as much as the initial pass.
  • Each section links to a more detailed guide if you want to go deeper on a specific area.

1. Confirm your legal and regulatory starting point

This can help you understand which technical standards, deadlines, or additional requirements may be relevant as you work through the checklist.

  • Review whether the ADA applies to your nonprofit, including whether your website could be treated as a place of public accommodation under Title III.
  • Check whether your organization receives federal financial assistance that could trigger Section 504's website accessibility requirements, particularly if any of that funding comes from HHS.
  • Decide which WCAG version and level your organization will use as a working target, since most of the technical items below are easier to evaluate against a specific standard.
  • Note any state law, government contract, or grant-specific accessibility requirements that may apply on top of federal rules.

2. Navigation and keyboard access

  • Test your main navigation, menus, and any modal windows or dropdowns using only a keyboard.
  • Confirm every interactive element has a visible focus indicator so keyboard users can see where they are on the page.
  • Check that no interactive component traps keyboard focus or prevents a user from moving forward or backward.
  • Make sure a logical tab order follows the visual layout of each page.

3. Images, headings, and page structure

  • Add meaningful alternative text to informative images, describing their purpose rather than just their content.
  • Mark purely decorative images so assistive technology can skip over them.
  • Use headings that describe the page structure in a logical order, rather than choosing heading levels for visual style.
  • Give each page a clear, descriptive page title.
  • Make sure links and buttons have clear, descriptive names so visitors can understand their purpose without relying only on surrounding visual context.

4. Color and contrast

  • Check text and background color combinations against your working WCAG contrast target.
  • Review contrast on buttons, form fields, and other interface elements, not just body text.
  • Confirm that important information, such as required fields or error states, doesn't rely on color alone.

5. Forms, donations, and multi-step processes

Forms tied to important visitor tasks, such as donations, registrations, and applications, are often where accessibility barriers most directly affect your core outcomes. Reviewing your donation form for common accessibility barriers covers this in more depth.

  • Confirm every form field has a clear, programmatically associated label.
  • Write error messages that explain what went wrong and how to fix it, rather than relying only on a red outline or icon.
  • Test your full donation flow using a keyboard and, where possible, a screen reader, from selecting an amount through confirmation.
  • Do the same for volunteer, membership, event, and program application forms, especially multi-step ones.
  • Include third-party forms and embedded platforms in your review because donors and applicants still interact with them as part of the overall journey, even when you don't control the underlying code.

6. Documents and multimedia

Nonprofits often publish annual reports, financial disclosures, and program materials as PDFs.

  • Identify which PDFs are used to apply for, access, or participate in a program, and review those first.
  • Confirm important PDFs have real, searchable text rather than existing only as a scanned image.
  • Add captions to video content, and consider audio description where information is communicated only visually.
  • Where practical, consider moving frequently updated PDF content to an accessible web page instead.

7. Testing and ongoing maintenance

Testing is most useful as an ongoing habit rather than a one-time project. Automated vs. manual accessibility testing explains what each method can and cannot catch, and how to build a lightweight testing workflow.

  • Run a quick automated scan, such as Clym's Scanner, to identify potential rule-based issues and get a starting list.
  • Do a keyboard-only pass and a basic screen reader spot-check on your highest-stakes pages.
  • Prioritize issues that block someone from completing an important task before addressing lower-impact issues.
  • Retest after any redesign, CMS change, or new third-party integration, not just once a year.
  • Build basic accessibility checks, such as alt text and heading structure, into your normal content publishing process.

8. Accessibility statement, feedback, and ownership

  • Publish an accessibility statement that reflects your organization's actual accessibility status, rather than making unsupported claims.
  • Give visitors a clear way to report accessibility barriers they encounter.
  • Assign someone on your team to review and respond to accessibility feedback on an ongoing basis.

Conclusion

No single checklist can capture every accessibility requirement that might apply to your nonprofit, and completing this one is a starting point, not confirmation of compliance.

It gives your team a practical, repeatable way to find and prioritize the barriers that matter most in the areas where nonprofit websites most often run into trouble.

Start with your legal and regulatory starting point, move through navigation, structure, forms, and documents, then build testing into your regular workflow rather than treating it as a one-time project.

Frequently asked questions

Not on its own. This checklist can help you identify and prioritize common barriers, but a full accessibility evaluation typically covers more detailed WCAG success criteria and testing methods than a general checklist can capture.

Revisit the checklist after a website redesign, CMS migration, or new third-party integration such as a donation or event platform. Many organizations also find it useful to review it periodically, such as annually, even without a specific trigger.

Start with the forms and pages tied to your core outcomes, typically your donation form, program or application pages, and event or volunteer registration. These tend to combine several risk factors, including custom controls and multi-step flows.

No. An in-house team can work through this checklist using free and low-cost tools. Organizations with more complex websites, higher legal exposure, or limited internal expertise may still benefit from a professional audit alongside it.

Prioritize issues that prevent someone from completing an important task, document the remaining issues, and create a plan for addressing them based on their impact and the resources available to your team. If visitors may encounter a known barrier in the meantime, give them a clear way to report the problem or request help.

Alex Margau

Compliance Content Manager

Compliance Content Manager | CIPP/E (IAPP) | CPACC (IAAP)

Alex is a Compliance Content Manager at Clym, where he researches and writes about everything related to data privacy and web accessibility compliance for businesses, helping them stay informed on their compliance needs and spreading awareness about making the web safer and more inclusive. When he's not writing about compliance, Alex has his nose in a book or is hiking in the great outdoors.

Find out more about Alex