Correction requests under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), later on amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), are less about volume and more about judgment. They typically emerge after a consumer reviews information disclosed through an access request and challenges its accuracy, forcing businesses to decide what should be corrected, what should remain unchanged, and how to document that decision without creating new risk. This article explains what the CCPA right to correct means in practice, when businesses must correct personal information, when they may lawfully refuse or limit correction, how correction requests interact with identity verification and response timelines, and how businesses should handle correction within broader consumer rights workflows.
Handling Correction Requests Under the CCPA: Assessing Accuracy and Managing Disputes
The right to correct is a relatively new but increasingly important consumer right introduced by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which amended the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), allowing California residents to request that businesses correct inaccurate personal information maintained about them.
In practice, correction requests rarely appear in isolation. They are most commonly submitted after a consumer exercises the right of access and reviews the personal information disclosed. When a consumer believes that certain data is inaccurate, outdated, or incomplete, the right to correct becomes the next step. This makes correction requests a follow-on right that sits directly between access and deletion in real-world workflows.
CCPA right to correct explained
The CCPA right to correct, introduced by the CPRA amendments, allows a consumer to request correction of inaccurate personal information that a business maintains about them, taking into account the nature of the information and the purpose for which it is used.
This right applies when:
- The business is subject to the CCPA
- The requester is a California resident
- The personal information relates to that consumer
- The consumer alleges that the information is inaccurate
Correction does not require businesses to accept every claim at face value. Instead,businesses must make a reasonable assessment of whether the personal information is inaccurate, taking into account the nature of the information and the purposes for which it is maintained, and whether correction is appropriate in light of its use.
How correction differs from access and deletion
Correction requests are distinct from other request-based rights under the CCPA.
- Access requests focus on disclosure of personal information
- Deletion requests focus on removal of personal information
- Correction requests focus on data accuracy and integrity
Unlike deletion, correction often involves judgment calls. Businesses must evaluate conflicting records, assess supporting information, and consider whether modifying the data would undermine legal, security, or operational requirements.
For related guidance, see our articles on handling access requests under the CCPA and handling deletion requests under the CCPA.
Correction requests and the 45-day timeline
Correction requests are request-based consumer rights and follow the same response timing framework as access and deletion requests.
In most cases, businesses must:
- Acknowledge receipt of the correction request within a reasonable timeframe (often treated as a best practice within 10 business days
- Verify the identity of the requester
- Respond within 45 days of receiving the request, subject to a possible extension
For a detailed explanation of response timing, see our guide on the CCPA 45-day response timeline.
Identity verification for correction requests
Before correcting personal information, businesses must take reasonable steps to verify the identity of the requester. Verification is particularly sensitive for correction requests because the data being changed is often the same data used for verification.
Businesses should avoid relying solely on the disputed information itself to verify identity. Instead, verification may involve:
- Email-based verification links sent to the address on file
- Account re-authentication
- Matching information not subject to the correction request
Verification requirements are explained in more detail in our article on verifying identity under the CCPA.
When must a business correct personal information?
Once a correction request is verified, a business must make a reasonable assessment of whether the personal information is inaccurate, taking into account the nature of the information and the purposes for which it is maintained
In practice, this may include:
- Updating inaccurate profile or account details
- Correcting outdated contact information
- Amending records used for ongoing customer communications or service delivery
Correction obligations apply to personal information actively used by the business and may extend to service providers where applicable.
When can a business refuse or limit correction?
The CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, does not require businesses to correct personal information in every circumstance. In practice, correction may be limited or refused where a business determines, based on a reasonable assessment, that:
- The information is accurate as maintained
- The information is necessary to comply with legal obligations
- The information is required for security or fraud prevention
- The information reflects a documented opinion or transaction history
Common correction scenarios and outcomes
Scenario | Typical business response |
|---|---|
Incorrect email address | Update account record |
Disputed transaction amount | Retain original record with explanation |
Alleged error in fraud flag | Assess but retain security controls |
Conflicting address records | Apply correction where operationally appropriate |
Inaccurate data vs. disputed but accurate data
Situation | Meaning under the CCPA | Typical handling approach |
|---|---|---|
Inaccurate data | Information is factually wrong or outdated | Correct the data using commercially reasonable efforts |
Disputed but accurate data | Consumer disagrees but data accurately reflects records or history | Retain data and explain why correction is not appropriate |
Documenting the rationale for refusal or limitation is critical to managing enforcement risk.
How correction requests interact with sensitive personal information
Correction requests may involve sensitive personal information. While the right to correct applies broadly to personal information, the CPRA separately provides a right to limit the use and disclosure of sensitive personal information. When correction requests involve sensitive data, businesses should take additional care during verification and handling to reduce the risk of improper access or disclosure.
Practical examples: handling CCPA correction requests
E-commerce example
A customer submits an access request and reviews the disclosed order history. The customer then submits a correction request claiming their billing address is inaccurate. After verifying identity through an email confirmation, the business updates the billing address used for future transactions while retaining historical records for tax and accounting purposes.
SaaS example
A SaaS user submits an access request and reviews account activity logs. The user disputes a job title stored in their profile. The business verifies the request through account authentication and updates the profile field, while leaving system-generated usage logs unchanged.
How correction requests fit into broader CCPA consumer rights obligations
Correction requests often follow access requests and may precede deletion requests. They interact closely with:
- Identity verification requirements
- Response timelines
- Data accuracy and minimization practices
- Recordkeeping and audit readiness
For a broader overview, see our hub on consumer rights under the CCPA and CPRA and the CCPA compliance guide for businesses.
How Clym helps businesses manage CCPA correction requests
Correction requests often create internal friction. Legal teams focus on defensibility, product teams focus on data accuracy, and support teams focus on closing tickets quickly. Clym is designed to give businesses a single operational layer where those interests come together.
With Clym installed on businesses’ websites consumers can submit consumer requests, such as requests to correct personal information, through the widget or in the Governance Portal. The requests are then automatically recorded into the Clym Control Center, where teams can see the full lifecycle of each request, from identify confirmation through final resolution of the request.
From the Control Center, businesses can:
- Review the original access disclosure that triggered the correction request
- Track verification status and statutory response deadlines
- Document the rationale behind correction decisions
- Communicate clarifications or outcomes directly to the requester
- Preserve an auditable record of what was corrected, what was not, and why
By centralizing correction requests alongside access, deletion, and other CCPA rights, Clym helps businesses move from ad hoc decision-making to a repeatable, defensible process that scales across teams and data systems.
Key takeaway
The CCPA right to correct is primarily about data accuracy, not data erasure. Businesses must balance consumer claims with operational reality, legal obligations, and security considerations. Clear verification, consistent evaluation, and careful documentation are central to managing correction requests effectively.
Frequently asked questions about the CCPA right to correct
The right to correct, introduced by the CPRA as an amendment to the CCPA, allows California residents to request correction of inaccurate personal information maintained by a business, subject to reasonable assessment and lawful limitations.
The response period begins when the business receives a verifiable consumer request. Businesses are expected to complete identity verification and any necessary assessment within the statutory response window.
Yes. A business may refuse or limit correction when the information is accurate, required for legal or security purposes, or reflects historical facts or opinions that should not be altered.
When internal systems contain conflicting information, businesses should assess which record is most accurate based on context and use. Correction may be applied to active operational data while preserving historical records for legal or audit purposes.
In some cases, yes. Businesses may ask for reasonable supporting information when assessing accuracy, provided the request is proportionate and does not create unnecessary barriers to exercising rights.
Businesses are not required to alter records that must be preserved for legal, regulatory, security, or accounting purposes. In these cases, businesses should explain why correction is limited and how the information is used going forward.
Alex is a Content Developer at Clym, where he researches and writes about everything related to data privacy and web accessibility compliance for businesses, helping them stay informed on their compliance needs and spreading awareness about making the web safer and more inclusive. When he’s not writing about compliance, Alex has his nose in a book or is hiking in the great outdoors.
Find out more about Alex